Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sol Hando's avatar

I voted for Zohran half-ironically, but a year in I have to say I’m extremely favorably impressed with his performance.

Cuomo was a non-starter. He lost the primary but still ran independently, which I think is a huge scam as it allows gaming of primaries like Trump did in 2016 (If I don’t win I’ll still run and pull away at least a few percent of voters, guaranteeing a Republican loss). Baffling this sort of thing isn’t illegal.

Sliwa was literally a joke so nothing’s there.

I was concerned that Zohran was going to be one of the unreflective socialist types I knew in college— singleminded on the aesthetics of policy (ignoring whether proposed policy would be effective) under the hierarchy of oppression.

Now basically all the policies I was concerned about haven’t materialized, or only in a a very minor way. While a lot of obvious, easy, but ignored things have been solved. More importantly he’s able to cut through the Gordion Knot of politics. He’s able to do a lot of pro-development things that only he could do. When the guy who froze rent wants to promote housing development or talks about rezoning it’s revolutionary. If it was someone less tenant friendly I think the same policies would be fought tooth and nail. I’m coming around to the idea that absent a complete political change that isn’t happening, Zohran is the only type of politician that can do what he does.

Even low-level resentment about housing seems to be down from my POV. I moderate nycapartments and pre-Zohran there was a *lot* of vitriolic hate towards landlords every single day. Now there’s still hatred, but it’s nowhere near as poisonous or common.

Overall I put his 1-year report card as B+, if only because he does paper over some bad for the long term budgetary stuff with good presentation. But graded on the curve of “politicians who run on freezing the rent” honestly he’s A or A+.

Ethan the Fake Hippie's avatar

this is an important aspect of all politics: competency and integrity are important regardless of where you fit on the political spectrum.

Nobody thought the biggest issue the winner of the 2016 election would have to face would be a flu-like pandemic, and yet the decisions the administration made relating to that crisis affected so many people so much more than almost anything else he did.

voters should keep this in mind, not just “how will this guy deal with our current crisis?” but “how will this guy deal with the crisis i dont even know is coming in 3 years?”

No posts

Ready for more?